cryptosnif
StarkNet Token (STRK)
Documentary contract0xca14007eff0db1f8135f4c25b34de49ab0d42766
Unrated · 0% Evidence coverage
Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage.
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes.
Inspect the evidenceThe source review explains documented mechanisms. Independent network checks remain pending.
Examined promise
This dossier examines the documented purpose and mechanisms of StarkNet Token (STRK) on the Ethereum network, identified by contract address 0xca14007eff0db1f8135f4c25b34de49ab0d42766. The objective is to explain the stated aims of this token based on available registry data. This examination does not verify deployed bytecode, current controllers, or live network operation. The scope is limited to documentary analysis of the provided summaries.
Established facts
The pinned Trust Wallet Ethereum integration record identifies Starknet with the symbol STRK and contract address 0xca14007eff0db1f8135f4c25b34de49ab0d42766. The record specifies 18 decimal places for amount representation, which does not measure supply or value. It labels the entry as ERC20 and active. The community-maintained description states that StarkNet is a permissionless decentralized Validity-Rollup, also known as a ZK-Rollup. It operates as an L2 network over Ethereum, enabling any dApp to offload computation without compromising Ethereum’s composability and security through StarkNet’s cryptographic proof system, STARK. These statements are attributed registry claims, not independently established issuer statements or operational observations. The general ERC-20 specification defines a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts, including totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, third-party transfers after authorization, approval, and remaining allowance. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use; a repeated approval overwrites that amount. The specification requires handling false transfer results and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol, and decimal-place metadata are optional in the standard. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply, or security. No token transaction was performed in this review. The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry used by the wallet and other projects. Inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with listed projects. The source explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so it cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. Scripts and documentation use the MIT license. The pinned wallet blockchain-information file names the network Ethereum, symbol ETH, and lists its project website and explorer. That named network context accompanies token records in the repository's Ethereum subtree. This identifies the documented integration network without reproducing its operation. The active status is a metadata label with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness, or investment return has been established.
Unknowns
Present independent control, beneficial ownership, usage, client adoption, supply, concentration, liquidity, and complete incident history remain unverified. The documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes. No independently reviewed criterion observation is admitted in this documentary lot for identity, usage, token-role, supply, concentration, value-capture, control, security, governance, accountability, incidents, continuity, or execution. The scoring coverage is 0%, resulting in an unrated status. Missing essential criteria include identity, supply, and control.
Consequences
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes. The absence of independent verification means that the stated aims of the token do not confirm operational reality. Users relying on registry labels should understand that these are community-submitted descriptions, not guarantees of functionality or safety. The lack of verified supply, control, or usage data prevents any assessment of economic risk or technical resilience.
Verdict
Operational strength remains unproven. The asset is unrated with 0% scoring coverage. No public admission of rating status exists. The dossier provides a useful documentary explanation of the stated purpose without implying an independent audit has occurred. The verdict is strictly based on the absence of verified evidence rather than negative findings.
Evidence that would change it
Reproduced identity checks, independent dated network observations, and criterion-specific evidence would be required to alter this status. Calibration and editorial review would follow the submission of such evidence. Until then, the unrated classification stands due to the lack of operational verification.
Each check earns its result.
| Check | Weight | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Exact asset identityEssential | 3% | Verification pending |
| Observable use | 15% | Verification pending |
| Economic role of the token | 10% | Verification pending |
| Supply mechanismsEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Ownership concentration | 8% | Verification pending |
| Value capture | 7% | Verification pending |
| Control powersEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Security verification | 7% | Verification pending |
| Decision process | 8% | Verification pending |
| Accountability | 7% | Verification pending |
| Incident history | 6% | Verification pending |
| Operational continuity | 4% | Verification pending |
| Execution conditions | 5% | Verification pending |
Family-specific checks: Observable usage, token necessity and dependencies.
Inspect the evidence
Sources behind this analysis
Trust Wallet: captured Ethereum record for Starknet
The pinned Trust Wallet Ethereum integration record names Starknet with symbol STRK, contract 0xca14007eff0db1f8135f4c25b34de49ab0d42766 and 18 decimal places. Decimal places concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry ERC20 and active. Its community-maintained description states: "StarkNet is a permissionless decentralized Validity-Rollup (also known as a “ZK-Rollup”). It operates as an L2 network over Ethereum, enabling any dApp to its computation – without compromising Ethereum’s composability and security, thanks to StarkNet’s cryptographic proof system – STARK." Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. This dossier may explain those stated aims with that attribution. No deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The general ERC-20 specification is separate from this token implementation. Treat the generic application family as a documentary contract subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: blockchains/ethereum/info/info.json (bbe582d25a22)
The pinned wallet blockchain-information file names the network Ethereum, symbol ETH, and lists its project website and explorer. That named network context accompanies token records in the repository's Ethereum subtree. This identifies the documented integration network without reproducing its operation. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: README.md (bbe582d25a22)
The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry of token information and logos across blockchains, used by the wallet and other projects. It says additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain. Anyone can submit assets, and inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. It also explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. The README states that its scripts and documentation use the MIT license. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Ethereum ERC-20: pinned token interface specification
The pinned ERC-20 specification describes a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It defines totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, third-party transfers after authorization, approval and remaining allowance. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use; a repeated approval overwrites that amount. The specification says callers must handle a false transfer result and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol and decimal-place metadata are optional in the standard. These interface requirements describe what a conforming implementation should do. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply or security. No token transaction was performed in this review. Copyright and related rights are waived under CC0.
Inspect the primary source ↗Only original summaries are distributed. Licensed raw market data stays private.