cryptosnif
Realm (REALM)
Documentary contract0x464fdb8affc9bac185a7393fd4298137866dcfb8
Unrated · 0% Evidence coverage
Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage.
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes.
Inspect the evidenceThe source review explains documented mechanisms. Independent network checks remain pending.
Examined promise
This dossier examines the documented purpose and mechanisms of Realm (REALM) on the eip155:1 network. The objective is to explain the stated aims of the token as recorded in community-maintained registries, without verifying live network operation or investment outcomes. The scope is limited to the documentary contract identity and the specific summaries provided for this review.
Established facts
The pinned Trust Wallet Ethereum integration record identifies REALM Token with the symbol REALM and contract address 0x464fdb8affc9bac185a7393fd4298137866dcfb8, noting 18 decimal places for amount representation. This registry entry labels the asset as ERC20 and active, attributing the description that REALM is the native token of the Realm metaverse to the community-maintained source. The general ERC-20 specification defines a standard interface for fungible tokens, including functions for total supply, balance checks, transfers, and allowances where an approved spender may use funds up to a set limit. The wallet project's integration registry serves as a community-maintained index of token information, where inclusion does not imply partnership or independent verification of the listed projects' operations.
Unknowns
Independent control, beneficial ownership, actual usage, client adoption, supply distribution, concentration, liquidity, and complete incident history remain unverified. No deployed bytecode, current controllers, or live network behavior has been observed. The general ERC-20 label establishes no independently checked compliance or actual implementation details for this specific contract. Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish operational reality or safety.
Consequences
Because the dossier relies solely on documentary claims from a community registry, it cannot confirm the economic niche, rights, or security of the asset. The absence of live-network validation means that the active status is a metadata label rather than proof of functionality. Investors or users cannot derive investment outcomes or safety assurances from these registry entries alone.
Verdict
Operational strength remains unproven. The asset is unrated with 0% scoring coverage due to missing essential evidence regarding identity verification, supply mechanics, and control structures. This verdict reflects the lack of independent operational verification rather than a judgment on fraud or safety.
Evidence that would change it
Reproduced identity checks, independent dated network observations, and criterion-specific evidence would be required to move beyond this documentary assessment. Calibration and editorial review based on verified transaction data or audited code would alter the unrated status.
Each check earns its result.
| Check | Weight | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Exact asset identityEssential | 3% | Verification pending |
| Observable use | 15% | Verification pending |
| Economic role of the token | 10% | Verification pending |
| Supply mechanismsEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Ownership concentration | 8% | Verification pending |
| Value capture | 7% | Verification pending |
| Control powersEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Security verification | 7% | Verification pending |
| Decision process | 8% | Verification pending |
| Accountability | 7% | Verification pending |
| Incident history | 6% | Verification pending |
| Operational continuity | 4% | Verification pending |
| Execution conditions | 5% | Verification pending |
Family-specific checks: Observable usage, token necessity and dependencies.
Inspect the evidence
Sources behind this analysis
Trust Wallet: captured Ethereum record for REALM Token
The pinned Trust Wallet Ethereum integration record names REALM Token with symbol REALM, contract 0x464fdb8affc9bac185a7393fd4298137866dcfb8 and 18 decimal places. Decimal places concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry ERC20 and active. Its community-maintained description states: "REALM is the native token of the Realm metaverse." Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. This dossier may explain those stated aims with that attribution. No deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The general ERC-20 specification is separate from this token implementation. Treat the generic application family as a documentary contract subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: blockchains/ethereum/info/info.json (bbe582d25a22)
The pinned wallet blockchain-information file names the network Ethereum, symbol ETH, and lists its project website and explorer. That named network context accompanies token records in the repository's Ethereum subtree. This identifies the documented integration network without reproducing its operation. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: README.md (bbe582d25a22)
The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry of token information and logos across blockchains, used by the wallet and other projects. It says additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain. Anyone can submit assets, and inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. It also explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. The README states that its scripts and documentation use the MIT license. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Ethereum ERC-20: pinned token interface specification
The pinned ERC-20 specification describes a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It defines totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, third-party transfers after authorization, approval and remaining allowance. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use; a repeated approval overwrites that amount. The specification says callers must handle a false transfer result and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol and decimal-place metadata are optional in the standard. These interface requirements describe what a conforming implementation should do. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply or security. No token transaction was performed in this review. Copyright and related rights are waived under CC0.
Inspect the primary source ↗Only original summaries are distributed. Licensed raw market data stays private.