cryptosnif
Hooked Protocol (HOOK)
Documentary contract0xa260e12d2b924cb899ae80bb58123ac3fee1e2f0
Unrated · 0% Evidence coverage
Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage.
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes.
Inspect the evidenceThe source review explains documented mechanisms. Independent network checks remain pending.
Examined promise
The documented subject is Hooked Protocol (HOOK), identified by the asset identity hooked-protocol-wallet-smartchain on the eip155:56 network. The pinned registry entry describes the token as an on-ramp layer for Web3 adoption to form community-owned economies. This statement represents a project claim attributed to the Trust Wallet registry, not an independently verified operational objective. The dossier examines this stated purpose against the available documentary record.
Established facts
The primary source is a pinned Trust Wallet integration record for BNB Smart Chain. It lists Hooked Token with symbol HOOK at documentary address 0xa260e12d2b924cb899ae80bb58123ac3fee1e2f0 with 18 decimal places. Decimal places define the smallest unit of amount representation and do not measure total supply or market value. The record labels the entry BEP20 and active. BEP20 is the token standard for BNB Smart Chain, analogous to ERC20 on Ethereum. The ERC20 specification defines a standard interface for fungible tokens, including functions for balance checks, transfers, and allowances. An allowance permits a named spender to use a specified amount of tokens on behalf of the owner. A repeated approval overwrites the previous allowance. The Trust Wallet Assets README confirms this is a community-maintained registry where inclusion does not imply partnership. The general ERC20 specification is separate from this specific token implementation. No live network observation was performed.
Unknowns
Present independent control, beneficial ownership, actual usage, client adoption, total supply distribution, concentration of holdings, liquidity depth, and complete incident history remain unverified. The dossier may explain stated aims but cannot confirm their execution. Documentary address matching establishes no current program behavior, deployed control, or safety. No deployed implementation rights, security audits, or investment outcomes were checked. The economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified.
Consequences
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes. The active metadata label is a registry status with no live-network validation. Without independent verification, the project's operational strength remains unproven. Users cannot rely on the registry description as evidence of functional utility or security.
Verdict
Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage. No public admission of operational status exists. The calculated score reflects missing essential data points including identity verification, supply confirmation, and control analysis. The project is classified as unrated due to insufficient evidence coverage.
Evidence that would change it
Reproduced identity checks, independent dated network observations, and criterion-specific evidence would be required to alter this verdict. Calibration and editorial review must follow the collection of such evidence. Current sources provide only documentary context, not operational proof.
Each check earns its result.
| Check | Weight | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Exact asset identityEssential | 3% | Verification pending |
| Observable use | 15% | Verification pending |
| Economic role of the token | 10% | Verification pending |
| Supply mechanismsEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Ownership concentration | 8% | Verification pending |
| Value capture | 7% | Verification pending |
| Control powersEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Security verification | 7% | Verification pending |
| Decision process | 8% | Verification pending |
| Accountability | 7% | Verification pending |
| Incident history | 6% | Verification pending |
| Operational continuity | 4% | Verification pending |
| Execution conditions | 5% | Verification pending |
Family-specific checks: Observable usage, token necessity and dependencies.
Inspect the evidence
Sources behind this analysis
Trust Wallet: captured BNB Smart Chain record for Hooked Token
The pinned Trust Wallet BNB Smart Chain integration record names Hooked Token with symbol HOOK, documentary address 0xa260e12d2b924cb899ae80bb58123ac3fee1e2f0 and 18 decimal places. Decimal places concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry BEP20 and active. Its community-maintained description states: "The on-ramp layer for massive Web3 adoption to form the ecosystem of future community-owned economies." Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. The dossier may explain those stated aims with that attribution. No deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The generic application family identifies only a documentary token subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown. The general ERC-20 specification is separate from this token implementation.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet: pinned BNB Smart Chain directory context
The pinned Trust Wallet smartchain network-context record identifies the community registry directory for BNB Smart Chain. This supplies documentary network context for entries in the same pinned directory. Promotional statements, network performance, consensus behavior, current deployment and control are not verified or admitted from this context.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: README.md (bbe582d25a22)
The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry of token information and logos across blockchains, used by the wallet and other projects. It says additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain. Anyone can submit assets, and inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. It also explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. The README states that its scripts and documentation use the MIT license. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Ethereum ERC-20: pinned token interface specification
The pinned ERC-20 specification describes a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It defines totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, third-party transfers after authorization, approval and remaining allowance. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use; a repeated approval overwrites that amount. The specification says callers must handle a false transfer result and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol and decimal-place metadata are optional in the standard. These interface requirements describe what a conforming implementation should do. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply or security. No token transaction was performed in this review. Copyright and related rights are waived under CC0.
Inspect the primary source ↗Only original summaries are distributed. Licensed raw market data stays private.