cryptosnif
Bone ShibaSwap (BONE)
Documentary contract0x9813037ee2218799597d83d4a5b6f3b6778218d9
Unrated · 0% Evidence coverage
Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage.
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes.
Inspect the evidenceThe source review explains documented mechanisms. Independent network checks remain pending.
Promise
This dossier examines the documented purpose and mechanisms of Bone ShibaSwap (BONE) on the eip155:1 network. The goal is to explain the stated aims of the token as recorded in community-maintained registries, without implying that an independent audit or operational verification has occurred.
Established facts
The pinned Trust Wallet Ethereum integration record identifies BONE SHIBASWAP with the symbol BONE at contract address 0x9813037ee2218799597d83d4a5b6f3b6778218d9. The record specifies 18 decimal places, a technical parameter for amount representation that does not measure supply or value. It labels the entry as ERC20 and active. The general ERC-20 specification defines a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts, including functions for totalSupply, balanceOf, transfers, and allowances. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use, and repeated approval overwrites that amount. This specification describes what a conforming implementation should do, but the wallet label establishes no independently checked compliance. The registry source is community-maintained, meaning inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with listed projects. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements. The network context confirms the Ethereum blockchain identity, but this source provides no live-network validation.
Unknowns
Present independent control, beneficial ownership, usage patterns, client adoption, supply distribution, concentration, liquidity, and complete incident history remain unverified. No deployed bytecode, current controllers, or network operation status has been established through this review. The registry excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. Consequently, the actual implementation details and economic niche remain unknown.
Consequences
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes. The attributed registry claim states that Bone is a governance token allowing the community to vote on proposals, with more holdings carrying more weight. However, this is a stated aim within a community-maintained description, not an independently established operational observation. Without verification of the smart contract code or on-chain activity, the functional reality of this governance mechanism remains speculative. The lack of verified data prevents any assessment of safety, rights, or performance.
Verdict
Operational strength remains unproven. The asset is unrated with 0% scoring coverage. Critical missing essential criteria include identity verification, supply confirmation, and control structure analysis. The dossier serves as a documentary explanation of stated aims, not an endorsement or risk assessment.
What would change it
Reproduced identity checks, independent dated network observations, and criterion-specific evidence would be required to move beyond this unrated status. Calibration and editorial review following such verification could establish a scored assessment. Until then, the subject remains a documented claim without operational proof.
Each check earns its result.
| Check | Weight | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Exact asset identityEssential | 3% | Verification pending |
| Observable use | 15% | Verification pending |
| Economic role of the token | 10% | Verification pending |
| Supply mechanismsEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Ownership concentration | 8% | Verification pending |
| Value capture | 7% | Verification pending |
| Control powersEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Security verification | 7% | Verification pending |
| Decision process | 8% | Verification pending |
| Accountability | 7% | Verification pending |
| Incident history | 6% | Verification pending |
| Operational continuity | 4% | Verification pending |
| Execution conditions | 5% | Verification pending |
Family-specific checks: Observable usage, token necessity and dependencies.
Inspect the evidence
Sources behind this analysis
Trust Wallet: captured Ethereum record for BONE SHIBASWAP
The pinned Trust Wallet Ethereum integration record names BONE SHIBASWAP with symbol BONE, contract 0x9813037ee2218799597d83d4a5b6f3b6778218d9 and 18 decimal places. Decimal places concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry ERC20 and active. Its community-maintained description states: "Bone is a governance token of Shibaswap ecosystem which will allow the #ShibArmy to vote on upcoming proposals. The more BONE the user holds, the more weight of their vote carries in these future endeavors." Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. This dossier may explain those stated aims with that attribution. No deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The general ERC-20 specification is separate from this token implementation. Treat the generic application family as a documentary contract subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: blockchains/ethereum/info/info.json (bbe582d25a22)
The pinned wallet blockchain-information file names the network Ethereum, symbol ETH, and lists its project website and explorer. That named network context accompanies token records in the repository's Ethereum subtree. This identifies the documented integration network without reproducing its operation. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: README.md (bbe582d25a22)
The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry of token information and logos across blockchains, used by the wallet and other projects. It says additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain. Anyone can submit assets, and inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. It also explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. The README states that its scripts and documentation use the MIT license. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Ethereum ERC-20: pinned token interface specification
The pinned ERC-20 specification describes a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It defines totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, third-party transfers after authorization, approval and remaining allowance. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use; a repeated approval overwrites that amount. The specification says callers must handle a false transfer result and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol and decimal-place metadata are optional in the standard. These interface requirements describe what a conforming implementation should do. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply or security. No token transaction was performed in this review. Copyright and related rights are waived under CC0.
Inspect the primary source ↗Only original summaries are distributed. Licensed raw market data stays private.