cryptosnif
ZOO Crypto World (ZOO)
Documentary contract0x1d229b958d5ddfca92146585a8711aecbe56f095
Unrated · 0% Evidence coverage
Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage.
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes.
Inspect the evidenceThe source review explains documented mechanisms. Independent network checks remain pending.
Promise
This dossier examines the documented purpose and mechanisms of ZOO Crypto World (ZOO) on the BNB Smart Chain network. The analysis is limited to the provided registry entries and technical specifications. It does not verify current network operation, deployed bytecode, or active control by any party.
Established facts
The pinned Trust Wallet integration record identifies ZooToken with the symbol Zoo at documentary address 0x1d229b958d5ddfca92146585a8711aecbe56f095 on eip155:56. The record specifies 18 decimal places for amount representation. This metadata defines precision but does not measure supply or value. The entry is labeled BEP20 and active within the community-maintained registry. The registry description states that the ZOO token is a utility token issued by ZOO - Crypto World. These statements are attributed claims from the registry and do not constitute independently verified issuer assertions or operational observations. The ERC-20 specification defines a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It requires functions for totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, and third-party transfers after authorization. An allowance allows a named spender to use a specified amount, where repeated approval overwrites the previous amount. The specification also mandates handling false transfer results and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol, and decimal-place metadata are optional under this standard. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance or actual deployed implementation.
Unknowns
Present independent control, beneficial ownership, usage patterns, client adoption, supply distribution, concentration, liquidity, and complete incident history remain unverified. No live network observation was performed to confirm the behavior of the contract at the documented address. The economic niche and specific scoring criteria for this asset remain unclassified. The general ERC-20 specification is separate from the specific implementation of this token. Inclusion in the registry does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. Scripts and documentation use the MIT license, but this covers code rights, not asset safety. No deployment bytecode, controller permissions, reserve assets, security audit results, or investment returns have been established.
Consequences
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes. The absence of independent verification means that the stated aims of the project cannot be confirmed as operational reality. Users relying solely on registry labels may face risks associated with unverified control or liquidity. The generic application family identifies only a documentary token subject without confirming its functional integrity.
Verdict
Operational strength remains unproven. The asset is unrated with 0% scoring coverage. Critical missing elements include identity verification, supply confirmation, and control assessment. The dossier provides no basis for an investment recommendation or safety assurance.
What would change it
Reproduced identity checks, independent dated network observations, and criterion-specific evidence would be required to alter this status. Calibration and editorial review following such verification could enable a scored assessment. Until then, the asset remains in an unknown state regarding operational and economic parameters.
Each check earns its result.
| Check | Weight | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Exact asset identityEssential | 3% | Verification pending |
| Observable use | 15% | Verification pending |
| Economic role of the token | 10% | Verification pending |
| Supply mechanismsEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Ownership concentration | 8% | Verification pending |
| Value capture | 7% | Verification pending |
| Control powersEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Security verification | 7% | Verification pending |
| Decision process | 8% | Verification pending |
| Accountability | 7% | Verification pending |
| Incident history | 6% | Verification pending |
| Operational continuity | 4% | Verification pending |
| Execution conditions | 5% | Verification pending |
Family-specific checks: Observable usage, token necessity and dependencies.
Inspect the evidence
Sources behind this analysis
Trust Wallet: captured BNB Smart Chain record for ZooToken
The pinned Trust Wallet BNB Smart Chain integration record names ZooToken with symbol Zoo, documentary address 0x1d229b958d5ddfca92146585a8711aecbe56f095 and 18 decimal places. Decimal places concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry BEP20 and active. Its community-maintained description states: "ZOO token is a utility token that was issued by ZOO - Crypto World. " Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. The dossier may explain those stated aims with that attribution. No deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The generic application family identifies only a documentary token subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown. The general ERC-20 specification is separate from this token implementation.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet: pinned BNB Smart Chain directory context
The pinned Trust Wallet smartchain network-context record identifies the community registry directory for BNB Smart Chain. This supplies documentary network context for entries in the same pinned directory. Promotional statements, network performance, consensus behavior, current deployment and control are not verified or admitted from this context.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: README.md (bbe582d25a22)
The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry of token information and logos across blockchains, used by the wallet and other projects. It says additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain. Anyone can submit assets, and inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. It also explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. The README states that its scripts and documentation use the MIT license. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Ethereum ERC-20: pinned token interface specification
The pinned ERC-20 specification describes a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It defines totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, third-party transfers after authorization, approval and remaining allowance. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use; a repeated approval overwrites that amount. The specification says callers must handle a false transfer result and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol and decimal-place metadata are optional in the standard. These interface requirements describe what a conforming implementation should do. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply or security. No token transaction was performed in this review. Copyright and related rights are waived under CC0.
Inspect the primary source ↗Only original summaries are distributed. Licensed raw market data stays private.