cryptosnif
Vai (VAI)
Documentary contract0x4bd17003473389a42daf6a0a729f6fdb328bbbd7
Unrated · 0% Evidence coverage
Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage.
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes.
Inspect the evidenceThe source review explains documented mechanisms. Independent network checks remain pending.
Promise
This dossier examines the documented purpose and mechanisms of Vai (VAI) on the eip155:56 network. The scope is limited to verifying the identity and stated aims found in pinned registry entries. We do not assess current market performance, supply dynamics, or investment outcomes. The goal is to separate documentary claims from independent operational verification.
Established facts
The pinned Trust Wallet BNB Smart Chain integration record identifies VAI Stablecoin with the symbol VAI and a documentary address of 0x4bd17003473389a42daf6a0a729f6fdb328bbbd7. This entry specifies 18 decimal places, which concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry as BEP20 and active. BEP20 is a token standard on BNB Smart Chain that mirrors the ERC-20 interface. The community-maintained description states that VAI is the world’s first decentralized stablecoin enabled by Venus and built on Binance Smart Chain. Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry where anyone can submit assets. Inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with listed projects. The general ERC-20 specification defines a standard interface for fungible tokens, including totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, and allowances. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use. A repeated approval overwrites that amount. These interface requirements describe what a conforming implementation should do. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply or security.
Unknowns
Present independent control, beneficial ownership, usage, client adoption, supply, concentration, liquidity and complete incident history remain unverified. No live network observation was performed. The dossier may explain stated aims with attribution, but no deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The generic application family identifies only a documentary token subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown.
Consequences
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established. A documentation review is not an independent operational verification. Missing evidence does not make a project fraudulent or unsafe, but it prevents any assessment of operational strength.
Verdict
Operational strength remains unproven. The asset is unrated with 0% scoring coverage. No public admission of operational status exists. The calculated scores indicate a status of unrated with zero coverage across all dimensions. Essential data points including identity, supply and control are missing. Unknowns span identity, usage, token-role, supply, concentration, value-capture, control, security, governance, accountability, incidents, continuity and execution.
What would change it
Reproduced identity checks, independent dated network observations and criterion-specific evidence would be required, followed by calibration and editorial review. Concrete research questions include verifying the deployed bytecode against the documentary address, identifying current controllers and access controls, observing actual transaction flows for supply and concentration, and checking for any completed audits or incident reports. Without these, the dossier remains a static record of registry claims rather than a dynamic assessment of network reality.
Each check earns its result.
| Check | Weight | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Exact asset identityEssential | 3% | Verification pending |
| Observable use | 15% | Verification pending |
| Economic role of the token | 10% | Verification pending |
| Supply mechanismsEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Ownership concentration | 8% | Verification pending |
| Value capture | 7% | Verification pending |
| Control powersEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Security verification | 7% | Verification pending |
| Decision process | 8% | Verification pending |
| Accountability | 7% | Verification pending |
| Incident history | 6% | Verification pending |
| Operational continuity | 4% | Verification pending |
| Execution conditions | 5% | Verification pending |
Family-specific checks: Observable usage, token necessity and dependencies.
Inspect the evidence
Sources behind this analysis
Trust Wallet: captured BNB Smart Chain record for VAI Stablecoin
The pinned Trust Wallet BNB Smart Chain integration record names VAI Stablecoin with symbol VAI, documentary address 0x4bd17003473389a42daf6a0a729f6fdb328bbbd7 and 18 decimal places. Decimal places concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry BEP20 and active. Its community-maintained description states: "VAI is the world’s first decentralized stablecoin, enabled by Venus, built on Binance Smart Chain." Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. The dossier may explain those stated aims with that attribution. No deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The generic application family identifies only a documentary token subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown. The general ERC-20 specification is separate from this token implementation.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet: pinned BNB Smart Chain directory context
The pinned Trust Wallet smartchain network-context record identifies the community registry directory for BNB Smart Chain. This supplies documentary network context for entries in the same pinned directory. Promotional statements, network performance, consensus behavior, current deployment and control are not verified or admitted from this context.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: README.md (bbe582d25a22)
The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry of token information and logos across blockchains, used by the wallet and other projects. It says additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain. Anyone can submit assets, and inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. It also explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. The README states that its scripts and documentation use the MIT license. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Ethereum ERC-20: pinned token interface specification
The pinned ERC-20 specification describes a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It defines totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, third-party transfers after authorization, approval and remaining allowance. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use; a repeated approval overwrites that amount. The specification says callers must handle a false transfer result and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol and decimal-place metadata are optional in the standard. These interface requirements describe what a conforming implementation should do. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply or security. No token transaction was performed in this review. Copyright and related rights are waived under CC0.
Inspect the primary source ↗Only original summaries are distributed. Licensed raw market data stays private.