cryptosnif
Sleepless AI Token (AI)
Documentary contract0xbda011d7f8ec00f66c1923b049b94c67d148d8b2
Unrated · 0% Evidence coverage
Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage.
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes.
Inspect the evidenceThe source review explains documented mechanisms. Independent network checks remain pending.
The documented promise
Sleepless AI Token (AI) is presented in the Trust Wallet registry as a Web3 and artificial intelligence gaming platform. The pinned entry describes the project as a groundbreaking blend of these technologies, aiming to merge AI with blockchain mechanics. This description originates from community submissions to the wallet’s asset directory. It establishes the stated purpose of the token but does not verify the actual functionality or economic model deployed on the network.
Established documentary facts
The primary evidence for this dossier is a documentary record from the Trust Wallet Assets repository. This record identifies Sleepless AI with the symbol AI on the BNB Smart Chain, identified by the network context eip155:56. The specific contract address listed is 0xbda011d7f8ec00f66c1923b049b94c67d148d8b2. The metadata labels the token as BEP20, which refers to the standard interface for fungible tokens on that chain, similar to ERC-20 on Ethereum. The record specifies 18 decimal places, a technical parameter defining how amounts are represented internally, not a measure of total supply or value. The registry itself is community-maintained, meaning inclusion reflects a submission rather than an independent audit or partnership verification. The general ERC-20 specification defines standard functions like balance checks and transfers, providing a baseline for how such tokens interact with wallets, but compliance is not confirmed here.
Unknowns and limitations
Critical operational details remain entirely unverified. There is no independent observation of the deployed bytecode at the listed address. Consequently, the current controllers, beneficial ownership, and actual usage of the token are unknown. The registry status does not confirm liquidity, supply concentration, or security audits. No incident history has been established. The gap between the promotional description in the registry and the actual on-chain behavior creates significant uncertainty. Without live network data, it is impossible to determine if the token functions as described or if it possesses any active utility.
Consequences of the gap
Relying solely on documentary registry entries carries inherent risk. A listing confirms only that a submission was made and accepted into the directory, not that the project is safe, active, or compliant with its claims. Investors or users cannot infer operational strength, financial returns, or technical safety from this source alone. The absence of verified control mechanisms means that any interaction with the contract occurs without known safeguards or governance structures. This lack of transparency prevents any meaningful assessment of investment risk or project viability.
Verdict
Sleepless AI Token (AI) is unrated with zero percent scoring coverage. The dossier relies exclusively on community-submitted registry data, which lacks independent verification of deployment, control, or usage. Operational strength remains unproven. The verdict is negative due to the complete absence of evidentiary support for the project's claimed mechanisms and safety. No score can be assigned until independent observations replace documentary assumptions.
Evidence that would change the verdict
A positive reassessment would require reproduced identity checks confirming the contract matches the listed address. Independent dated network observations are needed to verify active usage, liquidity, and controller permissions. Criterion-specific evidence covering security, governance, and supply distribution must be provided. Finally, calibration and editorial review based on these new data points would be necessary to move from an unrated status to a scored evaluation.
Each check earns its result.
| Check | Weight | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Exact asset identityEssential | 3% | Verification pending |
| Observable use | 15% | Verification pending |
| Economic role of the token | 10% | Verification pending |
| Supply mechanismsEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Ownership concentration | 8% | Verification pending |
| Value capture | 7% | Verification pending |
| Control powersEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Security verification | 7% | Verification pending |
| Decision process | 8% | Verification pending |
| Accountability | 7% | Verification pending |
| Incident history | 6% | Verification pending |
| Operational continuity | 4% | Verification pending |
| Execution conditions | 5% | Verification pending |
Family-specific checks: Observable usage, token necessity and dependencies.
Inspect the evidence
Sources behind this analysis
Trust Wallet: captured BNB Smart Chain record for Sleepless AI
The pinned Trust Wallet BNB Smart Chain integration record names Sleepless AI with symbol AI, documentary address 0xbda011d7f8ec00f66c1923b049b94c67d148d8b2 and 18 decimal places. Decimal places concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry BEP20 and active. Its community-maintained description states: "Where AI meets affections Sleepless AI emerges as a groundbreaking Web3+AI gaming platform, ingeniously blending artificial intelligence and blockchain technology." Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. The dossier may explain those stated aims with that attribution. No deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The generic application family identifies only a documentary token subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown. The general ERC-20 specification is separate from this token implementation.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet: pinned BNB Smart Chain directory context
The pinned Trust Wallet smartchain network-context record identifies the community registry directory for BNB Smart Chain. This supplies documentary network context for entries in the same pinned directory. Promotional statements, network performance, consensus behavior, current deployment and control are not verified or admitted from this context.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: README.md (bbe582d25a22)
The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry of token information and logos across blockchains, used by the wallet and other projects. It says additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain. Anyone can submit assets, and inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. It also explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. The README states that its scripts and documentation use the MIT license. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Ethereum ERC-20: pinned token interface specification
The pinned ERC-20 specification describes a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It defines totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, third-party transfers after authorization, approval and remaining allowance. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use; a repeated approval overwrites that amount. The specification says callers must handle a false transfer result and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol and decimal-place metadata are optional in the standard. These interface requirements describe what a conforming implementation should do. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply or security. No token transaction was performed in this review. Copyright and related rights are waived under CC0.
Inspect the primary source ↗Only original summaries are distributed. Licensed raw market data stays private.