cryptosnif
Neon EVM (NEON)
Documentary contractNeonTjSjsuo3rexg9o6vHuMXw62f9V7zvmu8M8Zut44
Unrated · 0% Evidence coverage
Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage.
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes.
Inspect the evidenceThe source review explains documented mechanisms. Independent network checks remain pending.
Promise
This dossier examines the documented purpose and mechanisms of Neon EVM (NEON) on the Solana network. The examination is limited to the provided documentary records and does not constitute an independent operational verification or investment recommendation.
Established facts
The pinned Trust Wallet Solana integration record identifies Neon EVM with the symbol NEON and the documentary address NeonTjSjsuo3rexg9o6vHuMXw62f9V7zvmu8M8Zut44. This entry uses 9 decimal places, a technical term referring to the number of digits used to represent token amounts, which does not measure supply or value. The registry labels this entry as SPL, indicating it follows the Solana Program Library standard for tokens, and marks it as active. The community-maintained description states that Neon EVM is a smart contract on Solana and describes Solana as a fast-growing blockchain using a proof-of-history consensus mechanism. Proof-of-history is a method for recording the elapsed time between events to establish order without a central clock. These statements are attributed registry claims from the Trust Wallet Assets repository, not independently verified issuer statements. The repository README confirms that inclusion in this community-maintained registry does not imply a direct partnership with listed projects and that additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain.
Unknowns
Present independent control, beneficial ownership, actual usage patterns, client adoption rates, total supply distribution, concentration of holdings, liquidity depth, and complete incident history remain unverified. No deployed implementation bytecode, current controllers, or live network behavior has been checked. The economic niche and specific scoring criteria for this asset remain classified and unknown due to the absence of independent data.
Consequences
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior, safety, or investment outcomes. The active metadata label reflects registry status, not live-network validation. Without independent verification, promotional statements regarding performance, partnerships, or utility cannot be confirmed as operational reality.
Verdict
Operational strength remains unproven. The asset is unrated with 0% scoring coverage. Critical missing elements include identity verification beyond the registry entry, supply data, and control structure confirmation. The lack of evidence prevents any assessment of security, governance, or resilience.
What would change it
Reproduced identity checks against on-chain data, independent dated network observations, and criterion-specific evidence covering technology, usage, economics, governance, and resilience would be required. Calibration and editorial review following such verification would enable a scored assessment.
Each check earns its result.
| Check | Weight | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Exact asset identityEssential | 3% | Verification pending |
| Observable use | 15% | Verification pending |
| Economic role of the token | 10% | Verification pending |
| Supply mechanismsEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Ownership concentration | 8% | Verification pending |
| Value capture | 7% | Verification pending |
| Control powersEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Security verification | 7% | Verification pending |
| Decision process | 8% | Verification pending |
| Accountability | 7% | Verification pending |
| Incident history | 6% | Verification pending |
| Operational continuity | 4% | Verification pending |
| Execution conditions | 5% | Verification pending |
Family-specific checks: Observable usage, token necessity and dependencies.
Inspect the evidence
Sources behind this analysis
Trust Wallet: captured Solana record for Neon EVM
The pinned Trust Wallet Solana integration record names Neon EVM with symbol NEON, documentary address NeonTjSjsuo3rexg9o6vHuMXw62f9V7zvmu8M8Zut44 and 9 decimal places. Decimal places concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry SPL and active. Its community-maintained description states: "Neon EVM is a smart contract on Solana. Solana is a fast-growing blockchain, which uses a proof-of-history consensus mechanism." Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. The dossier may explain those stated aims with that attribution. No deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The generic application family identifies only a documentary token subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet: pinned Solana directory context
The pinned Trust Wallet solana network-context record identifies the community registry directory for Solana. This supplies documentary network context for entries in the same pinned directory. Promotional statements, network performance, consensus behavior, current deployment and control are not verified or admitted from this context.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: README.md (bbe582d25a22)
The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry of token information and logos across blockchains, used by the wallet and other projects. It says additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain. Anyone can submit assets, and inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. It also explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. The README states that its scripts and documentation use the MIT license. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Only original summaries are distributed. Licensed raw market data stays private.