cryptosnif
Jerry The Turtle By Matt Furie (JYAI)
Documentary contract0x4e9623b7e5b6438542458f5ee828d65c24d3af8c
Unrated · 0% Evidence coverage
Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage.
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes.
Inspect the evidenceThe source review explains documented mechanisms. Independent network checks remain pending.
Promise
This dossier examines the documented purpose and mechanisms of Jerry The Turtle By Matt Furie (JYAI) on the Ethereum network. The objective is to explain the stated aims of this token based on available registry data, without verifying live network operation or investment outcomes.
Established facts
The Trust Wallet Ethereum integration record identifies a token named Jerry The Turtle By Matt Furie with the symbol JYAI at contract address 0x4e9623b7e5b6438542458f5ee828d65c24d3af8c. This entry specifies eighteen decimal places for amount representation and labels the asset as ERC20 and active. The community-maintained description states that Jerry the Turtle is a character created by Matt Furie. It further describes JERRY as an AI-driven meme coin with the goal of establishing an AI-powered production house for video series featuring characters from Matt Furie’s universe alongside those from Jerry’s world. These statements are attributed registry claims, not independently verified issuer assertions. The record exists within the broader Trust Wallet Assets repository, which is a community-maintained registry used by the wallet and other projects. Inclusion in this registry does not imply a direct partnership with listed projects, and the active status is a metadata label without live-network validation. The general ERC-20 specification defines a standard interface for fungible tokens, including functions for total supply, balance checks, transfers, and allowances. An allowance permits a named spender to use a specified amount of tokens, with repeated approvals overwriting previous amounts. This specification outlines requirements for conforming implementations but does not confirm that this specific contract adheres to them.
Unknowns
Independent verification of deployed bytecode, current controllers, beneficial ownership, actual usage, client adoption, supply distribution, concentration, liquidity, and complete incident history remains unverified. No live network observation was performed to validate the operational strength or security of the contract. The documentary mechanism alone cannot establish actual network behavior.
Consequences
Because the registry descriptions are documentary claims rather than independent operational observations, the stated purpose of creating an AI-powered production house remains unproven in practice. The absence of verified control, supply, and usage data means that investment outcomes and network reliability cannot be assessed. Users relying on this registry entry should understand that inclusion does not guarantee safety, functionality, or adherence to the described vision.
Verdict
Operational strength remains unproven. The asset is unrated with zero percent scoring coverage across all criteria. Critical missing evidence includes identity verification, supply confirmation, and control assessment. The dossier serves as a documentary explanation of stated aims without implying any independent audit has occurred.
Evidence that would change it
Reproduced identity checks, independent dated network observations, and criterion-specific evidence regarding deployment, controller permissions, and transaction history would be required to update this assessment. Calibration and editorial review following such verification could alter the unrated status.
Each check earns its result.
| Check | Weight | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Exact asset identityEssential | 3% | Verification pending |
| Observable use | 15% | Verification pending |
| Economic role of the token | 10% | Verification pending |
| Supply mechanismsEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Ownership concentration | 8% | Verification pending |
| Value capture | 7% | Verification pending |
| Control powersEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Security verification | 7% | Verification pending |
| Decision process | 8% | Verification pending |
| Accountability | 7% | Verification pending |
| Incident history | 6% | Verification pending |
| Operational continuity | 4% | Verification pending |
| Execution conditions | 5% | Verification pending |
Family-specific checks: Observable usage, token necessity and dependencies.
Inspect the evidence
Sources behind this analysis
Trust Wallet: captured Ethereum record for Jerry The Turtle By Matt Furie
The pinned Trust Wallet Ethereum integration record names Jerry The Turtle By Matt Furie with symbol JYAI, contract 0x4e9623b7e5b6438542458f5ee828d65c24d3af8c and 18 decimal places. Decimal places concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry ERC20 and active. Its community-maintained description states: "Jerry the Turtle, created by Matt Furie, is a character inspired by Furie’s artistic style. JERRY is also an AI-driven meme coin with an ambitious vision. The goal is to establish an AI-powered production house dedicated to creating a video series or episodes featuring characters from Matt Furie’s universe alongside those from Jerry’s world." Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. This dossier may explain those stated aims with that attribution. No deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The general ERC-20 specification is separate from this token implementation. Treat the generic application family as a documentary contract subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: blockchains/ethereum/info/info.json (bbe582d25a22)
The pinned wallet blockchain-information file names the network Ethereum, symbol ETH, and lists its project website and explorer. That named network context accompanies token records in the repository's Ethereum subtree. This identifies the documented integration network without reproducing its operation. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: README.md (bbe582d25a22)
The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry of token information and logos across blockchains, used by the wallet and other projects. It says additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain. Anyone can submit assets, and inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. It also explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. The README states that its scripts and documentation use the MIT license. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Ethereum ERC-20: pinned token interface specification
The pinned ERC-20 specification describes a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It defines totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, third-party transfers after authorization, approval and remaining allowance. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use; a repeated approval overwrites that amount. The specification says callers must handle a false transfer result and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol and decimal-place metadata are optional in the standard. These interface requirements describe what a conforming implementation should do. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply or security. No token transaction was performed in this review. Copyright and related rights are waived under CC0.
Inspect the primary source ↗Only original summaries are distributed. Licensed raw market data stays private.