cryptosnif
Itam Games (ITAM)
Documentary contract0x04c747b40be4d535fc83d09939fb0f626f32800b
Unrated · 0% Evidence coverage
Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage.
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes.
Inspect the evidenceThe source review explains documented mechanisms. Independent network checks remain pending.
Examined promise
This dossier examines the documented purpose and mechanisms of Itam Games (ITAM) on the eip155:56 network. The primary objective is to verify the identity of the asset at address 0x04c747b40be4d535fc83d09939fb0f626f32800b against its stated aims in community registries. We assess whether the recorded information aligns with standard token interfaces and what gaps remain before any operational or investment conclusion can be drawn.
Established facts
The pinned Trust Wallet BNB Smart Chain integration record identifies ITAM with the symbol ITAM, a documentary address of 0x04c747b40be4d535fc83d09939fb0f626f32800b, and 18 decimal places. Decimal places concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry BEP20 and active. Its community-maintained description states that ITAM operates a platform (NFT.Farm) that values digital assets and freely trades such assets using ITAM NFT. ITAM NFT is described as Middleware technology for cultural and artistic creations such as paintings, comics, fashion, and games. Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. The generic application family identifies only a documentary token subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown. The general ERC-20 specification is separate from this token implementation. The pinned Trust Wallet smartchain network-context record identifies the community registry directory for BNB Smart Chain, supplying documentary network context for entries in the same pinned directory. Promotional statements, network performance, consensus behavior, current deployment and control are not verified or admitted from this context. The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry of token information and logos across blockchains, used by the wallet and other projects. It says additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain. Anyone can submit assets, and inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. It also explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. The README states that its scripts and documentation use the MIT license. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established. The pinned ERC-20 specification describes a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It defines totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, third-party transfers after authorization, approval and remaining allowance. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use; a repeated approval overwrites that amount. The specification says callers must handle a false transfer result and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol and decimal-place metadata are optional in the standard. These interface requirements describe what a conforming implementation should do. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply or security. No token transaction was performed in this review. Copyright and related rights are waived under CC0.
Unknowns
Present independent control, beneficial ownership, usage, client adoption, supply, concentration, liquidity and complete incident history remain unverified. No deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The dossier may explain those stated aims with that attribution. No public admission of operational status exists beyond the registry metadata.
Consequences
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. Inclusion in the community registry does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. Without independent verification, the claimed middleware functionality and trading capabilities remain theoretical rather than observed.
Verdict
Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage. The absence of independent criterion observations prevents any assessment of identity, usage, token-role, supply, concentration, value-capture, control, security, governance, accountability, incidents, continuity or execution. The calculated scores confirm this unrated status with zero coverage across all dimensions including technology, usage, economics, governance, resilience and liquidity.
Evidence that would change it
Reproduced identity checks, independent dated network observations and criterion-specific evidence, followed by calibration and editorial review, would be required to move from an unrated status to a scored evaluation. Specific questions include verifying if the contract at 0x04c747b40be4d535fc83d09939fb0f626f32800b actually implements the described NFT.Farm middleware functions, confirming who controls the contract keys, and observing real-world usage metrics distinct from registry claims.
Each check earns its result.
| Check | Weight | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Exact asset identityEssential | 3% | Verification pending |
| Observable use | 15% | Verification pending |
| Economic role of the token | 10% | Verification pending |
| Supply mechanismsEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Ownership concentration | 8% | Verification pending |
| Value capture | 7% | Verification pending |
| Control powersEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Security verification | 7% | Verification pending |
| Decision process | 8% | Verification pending |
| Accountability | 7% | Verification pending |
| Incident history | 6% | Verification pending |
| Operational continuity | 4% | Verification pending |
| Execution conditions | 5% | Verification pending |
Family-specific checks: Observable usage, token necessity and dependencies.
Inspect the evidence
Sources behind this analysis
Trust Wallet: captured BNB Smart Chain record for ITAM
The pinned Trust Wallet BNB Smart Chain integration record names ITAM with symbol ITAM, documentary address 0x04c747b40be4d535fc83d09939fb0f626f32800b and 18 decimal places. Decimal places concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry BEP20 and active. Its community-maintained description states: "ITAM operates a platform (NFT.Farm) that values digital assets and freely trades such assets using ITAM NFT. ITAM NFT is a Middleware technology for cultural and artistic creations such as paintings, comics, fashion, and games." Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. The dossier may explain those stated aims with that attribution. No deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The generic application family identifies only a documentary token subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown. The general ERC-20 specification is separate from this token implementation.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet: pinned BNB Smart Chain directory context
The pinned Trust Wallet smartchain network-context record identifies the community registry directory for BNB Smart Chain. This supplies documentary network context for entries in the same pinned directory. Promotional statements, network performance, consensus behavior, current deployment and control are not verified or admitted from this context.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: README.md (bbe582d25a22)
The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry of token information and logos across blockchains, used by the wallet and other projects. It says additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain. Anyone can submit assets, and inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. It also explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. The README states that its scripts and documentation use the MIT license. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Ethereum ERC-20: pinned token interface specification
The pinned ERC-20 specification describes a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It defines totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, third-party transfers after authorization, approval and remaining allowance. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use; a repeated approval overwrites that amount. The specification says callers must handle a false transfer result and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol and decimal-place metadata are optional in the standard. These interface requirements describe what a conforming implementation should do. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply or security. No token transaction was performed in this review. Copyright and related rights are waived under CC0.
Inspect the primary source ↗Only original summaries are distributed. Licensed raw market data stays private.