cryptosnif
EN ↗
EnglishFrançaisPortuguês (Brasil)EspañolLanguage keeps this subject. Country is selected separately on service pages.
Crash test / Application / CT-IOTA-001

IOTA (IOTA)

BNB Smart Chain · Token contract · Documentation reviewed

Documentary contract0xd944f1d1e9d5f9bb90b62f9d45e447d989580782

The verdict

Unrated · 0% Evidence coverage

Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage.

Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes.

Inspect the evidence
UnratedOverall score / 100
0%Evidence coverage
13 checks pending85% coverage and 3 essential checks required for a score
2026-10-06Documentation checked · Candidate method 0.1.0

Documentation review · Reviewed · catalogue-documentary-1

The source review explains documented mechanisms. Independent network checks remain pending.

The documented promise

This dossier examines the IOTA (IOTA) asset as recorded in the Trust Wallet registry for the BNB Smart Chain network. The pinned entry identifies a token with the symbol IOTA and the documentary address 0xd944f1d1e9d5f9bb90b62f9d45e447d989580782. The registry description attributes to this entry a purpose linked to the Tangle, described as a distributed ledger technology aiming for higher speeds than conventional blockchains and suitability for the Internet of Things ecosystem. These statements are attributed claims from the community-maintained registry and do not constitute independent verification of the project's technical architecture or current operational status. The scope is limited to these documentary records; deployed bytecode, current controllers, and live network behavior remain unverified.

Established facts

The primary source is a pinned integration record within the Trust Wallet Assets repository for the BNB Smart Chain. This record labels the asset as BEP20, indicating it conforms to the standard interface for fungible tokens on that specific network. The ERC-20 specification defines the core functions required for such tokens, including total supply queries, balance checks, transfers, and allowance management where a spender is authorized to use a set amount. The registry context confirms that this directory serves as a community-maintained list used by the wallet software. Inclusion in this registry does not imply a partnership with the listed projects, nor does it validate the accuracy of the descriptive text provided by submitters. The document also notes that brand-new tokens are excluded from submissions, meaning this record reflects a specific snapshot of community reporting rather than an exhaustive or real-time inventory. No live network observation, audit, or transaction analysis was performed during this review.

Unknowns

Several critical aspects of the asset remain entirely unknown due to the absence of independent verification. The actual control mechanisms, beneficial ownership, and current deployment status of the contract at the specified address are unverified. There is no evidence regarding the token's usage, adoption rates, liquidity depth, or concentration of holdings. The completeness of the incident history and the continuity of the project's operations cannot be established from the registry data alone. The distinction between the registry's description of the Tangle technology and the actual implementation of the smart contract at the given address is undefined. Furthermore, the economic niche, scoring criteria, and investment outcomes associated with this specific token instance are classified as unknown. The active metadata label in the registry provides no proof of ongoing development or security.

Consequences

Relying solely on documentary mechanisms and registry listings carries significant limitations. A registry entry establishes only that a submission was made and accepted into the community database; it does not confirm the safety, functionality, or legitimacy of the underlying code. Users interacting with this token based on the registry description may face risks related to unverified control structures, potential liquidity issues, or lack of transparency. The gap between the stated aims of the Tangle technology and the actual behavior of the BEP20 token on the BNB Smart Chain creates uncertainty. Without independent operational verification, investors and users cannot assess the true value capture, governance rights, or resilience of the asset. The absence of verified identity and supply data means that any assessment of risk or utility is speculative.

Verdict

The operational strength of the IOTA (IOTA) asset on the BNB Smart Chain remains unproven. With zero percent scoring coverage across all essential criteria, the asset is rated unrated. The available evidence consists exclusively of community-submitted registry data, which lacks the independent validation required to assign a score. Critical dimensions such as identity, supply, and control are missing from the evidentiary base. Consequently, no conclusion can be drawn regarding the safety, performance, or viability of this specific token implementation. The dossier highlights a clear disconnect between the promotional claims in the registry and the lack of factual, verifiable data about the asset's current state.

Evidence that would change it

A revised assessment would require reproduced identity checks confirming the contract owner and controller permissions. Independent dated network observations verifying the token's functionality, liquidity, and transaction history on the BNB Smart Chain are necessary. Criterion-specific evidence covering security audits, incident reports, and governance structures must be provided. Calibration against established standards for fungible tokens and editorial review of the new data would be required before any score could be assigned. Until such independent verification is obtained, the unrated status and the identified unknowns will persist.

02 / Crash test

Each check earns its result.

Candidate method 0.1.0. Unknown results are excluded from the score calculation.
CheckWeightResult
Exact asset identityEssential3%Verification pending
Observable use15%Verification pending
Economic role of the token10%Verification pending
Supply mechanismsEssential10%Verification pending
Ownership concentration8%Verification pending
Value capture7%Verification pending
Control powersEssential10%Verification pending
Security verification7%Verification pending
Decision process8%Verification pending
Accountability7%Verification pending
Incident history6%Verification pending
Operational continuity4%Verification pending
Execution conditions5%Verification pending

Family-specific checks: Observable usage, token necessity and dependencies.

03 / Evidence

Inspect the evidence

Sources behind this analysis

Trust Wallet: captured BNB Smart Chain record for MIOTAC

The pinned Trust Wallet BNB Smart Chain integration record names MIOTAC with symbol IOTA, documentary address 0xd944f1d1e9d5f9bb90b62f9d45e447d989580782 and 6 decimal places. Decimal places concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry BEP20 and active. Its community-maintained description states: "IOTA is a distributed ledger with its proprietary technology known as Tangle, a system of nodes that confirm transactions. It aims to offer greater speeds than conventional blockchains and an ideal footprint for the ever-expanding Internet of Things ecosystem." Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. The dossier may explain those stated aims with that attribution. No deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The generic application family identifies only a documentary token subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown. The general ERC-20 specification is separate from this token implementation.

Retrieved . Scope: documentation. Current network operation remains unverified.

Inspect the primary source ↗

Snapshot SHA-256: 0ca4ded4f747a41ac4e3c28f7f965eec11a4982d961e388e4502930bf058ed76

Trust Wallet: pinned BNB Smart Chain directory context

The pinned Trust Wallet smartchain network-context record identifies the community registry directory for BNB Smart Chain. This supplies documentary network context for entries in the same pinned directory. Promotional statements, network performance, consensus behavior, current deployment and control are not verified or admitted from this context.

Retrieved . Scope: documentation. Current network operation remains unverified.

Inspect the primary source ↗

Snapshot SHA-256: 9888dd19b8ace07b4a705771770ab5140129ba43ec4ce6e95932dd63af204278

Trust Wallet Assets: README.md (bbe582d25a22)

The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry of token information and logos across blockchains, used by the wallet and other projects. It says additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain. Anyone can submit assets, and inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. It also explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. The README states that its scripts and documentation use the MIT license. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.

Retrieved . Scope: documentation. Current network operation remains unverified.

Inspect the primary source ↗

Snapshot SHA-256: 51fc8f690972c850271ca0a6086516eae5ed411e94982fcae6534a4d08fccd73

Ethereum ERC-20: pinned token interface specification

The pinned ERC-20 specification describes a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It defines totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, third-party transfers after authorization, approval and remaining allowance. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use; a repeated approval overwrites that amount. The specification says callers must handle a false transfer result and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol and decimal-place metadata are optional in the standard. These interface requirements describe what a conforming implementation should do. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply or security. No token transaction was performed in this review. Copyright and related rights are waived under CC0.

Retrieved . Scope: documentation. Current network operation remains unverified.

Inspect the primary source ↗

Snapshot SHA-256: 50d0bdc535ed8987ac5c124cb5f9c39606806c97e909aae66ef4b747dd9c93dd

Only original summaries are distributed. Licensed raw market data stays private.

Continue the investigation