cryptosnif
Hoppy (HOPPY)
Documentary contract0x6e79b51959cf968d87826592f46f819f92466615
Unrated · 0% Evidence coverage
Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage.
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes.
Inspect the evidenceThe source review explains documented mechanisms. Independent network checks remain pending.
Promise
This dossier examines the documented purpose and mechanisms of Hoppy (HOPPY) on the Ethereum network. The goal is to explain the stated aims and concrete research questions for this token based on available registry data. We do not provide investment advice, price targets, or independent operational verification.
Established facts
The pinned Trust Wallet Ethereum integration record identifies Hoppy with the symbol HOPPY and contract address 0x6e79b51959cf968d87826592f46f819f92466615. The record specifies nine decimal places for amount representation. This metadata does not measure supply or value. The entry is labeled ERC20 and active within the community-maintained registry. The registry description attributes Hoppy to an anthropomorphic frog character from the comic book The Night Riders by Matt Furie. It states the character infuses humor and meme magic into the world. These are attributed registry claims, not independently established issuer statements. The general ERC-20 specification defines a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It includes functions for totalSupply, balanceOf, transfers, and allowances. An allowance permits a named spender to use funds up to a set amount. A repeated approval overwrites that limit. The specification requires handling false transfer results and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol, and decimals are optional in the standard. This wallet label establishes no independently checked compliance or actual deployed implementation.
Unknowns
Present independent control, beneficial ownership, usage, client adoption, supply, concentration, liquidity, and complete incident history remain unverified. No live network observation was performed. The active status is a metadata label with no live-network validation. Inclusion in the registry does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. The registry excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so it cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. No deployment bytecode, controller permissions, reserve assets, security audit, or investment return has been established.
Consequences
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes. The gap between registry labels and operational reality means that economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified. Users relying solely on this documentation may lack visibility into critical risk factors such as control centralization or liquidity constraints.
Verdict
Operational strength remains unproven. The asset is unrated with zero percent scoring coverage. Critical missing elements include identity verification, supply confirmation, and control structure analysis. The current evidence base supports only a documentary explanation of stated aims, not an assessment of technical or economic viability.
What would change it
Reproduced identity checks, independent dated network observations, and criterion-specific evidence would be required to move beyond this unrated status. Calibration and editorial review following such verification would allow for a scored assessment. Until then, the dossier remains a static record of registry claims without operational validation.
Each check earns its result.
| Check | Weight | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Exact asset identityEssential | 3% | Verification pending |
| Observable use | 15% | Verification pending |
| Economic role of the token | 10% | Verification pending |
| Supply mechanismsEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Ownership concentration | 8% | Verification pending |
| Value capture | 7% | Verification pending |
| Control powersEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Security verification | 7% | Verification pending |
| Decision process | 8% | Verification pending |
| Accountability | 7% | Verification pending |
| Incident history | 6% | Verification pending |
| Operational continuity | 4% | Verification pending |
| Execution conditions | 5% | Verification pending |
Family-specific checks: Observable usage, token necessity and dependencies.
Inspect the evidence
Sources behind this analysis
Trust Wallet: captured Ethereum record for Hoppy
The pinned Trust Wallet Ethereum integration record names Hoppy with symbol HOPPY, contract 0x6e79b51959cf968d87826592f46f819f92466615 and 9 decimal places. Decimal places concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry ERC20 and active. Its community-maintained description states: "Hoppy is an anthropomorphic frog character based on the famous comic book «The Night Riders», published in 2012 by artist and illustrator Matt Furie. Today, this is one of the few characters of Matt Furie that can truly be considered unique. Hoppy began his memetic revolution through countless iterations of memes cementing his iconic status, mastering every form with his unparalleled power. With its roots in internet culture, Hoppy infuses humor and meme magic into the world, fostering a movement that unites and makes everyone happy." Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. This dossier may explain those stated aims with that attribution. No deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The general ERC-20 specification is separate from this token implementation. Treat the generic application family as a documentary contract subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: blockchains/ethereum/info/info.json (bbe582d25a22)
The pinned wallet blockchain-information file names the network Ethereum, symbol ETH, and lists its project website and explorer. That named network context accompanies token records in the repository's Ethereum subtree. This identifies the documented integration network without reproducing its operation. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: README.md (bbe582d25a22)
The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry of token information and logos across blockchains, used by the wallet and other projects. It says additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain. Anyone can submit assets, and inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. It also explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. The README states that its scripts and documentation use the MIT license. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Ethereum ERC-20: pinned token interface specification
The pinned ERC-20 specification describes a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It defines totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, third-party transfers after authorization, approval and remaining allowance. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use; a repeated approval overwrites that amount. The specification says callers must handle a false transfer result and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol and decimal-place metadata are optional in the standard. These interface requirements describe what a conforming implementation should do. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply or security. No token transaction was performed in this review. Copyright and related rights are waived under CC0.
Inspect the primary source ↗Only original summaries are distributed. Licensed raw market data stays private.