cryptosnif
EN ↗
EnglishFrançaisPortuguês (Brasil)EspañolLanguage keeps this subject. Country is selected separately on service pages.
Crash test / Application / CT-USDTb-001

Ethena Labs (USDTb) (USDTb)

Ethereum · Token contract · Documentation reviewed

Documentary contract0xc139190f447e929f090edeb554d95abb8b18ac1c

The verdict

Unrated · 0% Evidence coverage

Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage.

Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes.

Inspect the evidence
UnratedOverall score / 100
0%Evidence coverage
13 checks pending85% coverage and 3 essential checks required for a score
2026-10-06Documentation checked · Candidate method 0.1.0

Documentation review · Reviewed · catalogue-documentary-1

The source review explains documented mechanisms. Independent network checks remain pending.

Promise

This dossier examines the documented purpose and mechanisms of Ethena Labs (USDTb) on the Ethereum network. The objective is to explain the stated aims and technical context provided by the source registry, without adopting promotional claims or verifying live network operation.

Established facts

The Trust Wallet Ethereum integration record identifies USDtb with the symbol USDtb at contract address 0xc139190f447e929f090edeb554d95abb8b18ac1c. The record specifies 18 decimal places for amount representation. This label does not measure supply or value. The entry is marked as ERC20 and active within the community-maintained registry. The general ERC-20 specification defines a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It establishes functions for reading total supply and balances, executing transfers, and managing allowances. An allowance permits a named spender to use a specified amount; repeated approval overwrites that limit. The specification requires handling false transfer results and emitting Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol, and decimal metadata are optional under this standard. The wallet project describes its registry as a community-maintained collection used by the wallet and other projects. Inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with listed projects. The registry explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions. The pinned blockchain information file names the network Ethereum, symbol ETH, and provides links to the project website and explorer. This source identifies the documented integration network without reproducing its operation. The registry descriptions are documentary claims, not independently verified issuer statements. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness, or investment return has been established through this review.

Unknowns

Present independent control, beneficial ownership, actual usage, client adoption, supply distribution, concentration, liquidity, and complete incident history remain unverified. The registry status is a metadata label with no live-network validation. No deployed implementation rights or safety checks were performed. The specific token implementation compliance with the ERC-20 standard is not independently confirmed. The economic niche and scoring criteria for this asset remain unclassified.

Consequences

Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes. The attributed registry description states the token is backed by institutional grade tokenized treasury funds and powered by Ethena Labs. These are project claims within the registry entry, not independently established operational observations. Relying solely on this documentation risks conflating stated aims with verified functionality. Users must distinguish between the wallet registry's descriptive labels and the actual on-chain state of the contract.

Verdict

Operational strength remains unproven. The asset holds an unrated status with zero percent scoring coverage. Critical missing evidence includes identity verification, supply data, and control mechanisms. The dossier serves as a documentary explanation of the registry entry rather than an independent operational verification. No public admission of liability or audit results is present.

What would change it

Reproduced identity checks, independent dated network observations, and criterion-specific evidence would be required to alter this assessment. Calibration and editorial review following such verification could establish a scored status. Until then, the lack of independent validation maintains the unrated classification.

02 / Crash test

Each check earns its result.

Candidate method 0.1.0. Unknown results are excluded from the score calculation.
CheckWeightResult
Exact asset identityEssential3%Verification pending
Observable use15%Verification pending
Economic role of the token10%Verification pending
Supply mechanismsEssential10%Verification pending
Ownership concentration8%Verification pending
Value capture7%Verification pending
Control powersEssential10%Verification pending
Security verification7%Verification pending
Decision process8%Verification pending
Accountability7%Verification pending
Incident history6%Verification pending
Operational continuity4%Verification pending
Execution conditions5%Verification pending

Family-specific checks: Observable usage, token necessity and dependencies.

03 / Evidence

Inspect the evidence

Sources behind this analysis

Trust Wallet: captured Ethereum record for USDtb

The pinned Trust Wallet Ethereum integration record names USDtb with symbol USDtb, contract 0xc139190f447e929f090edeb554d95abb8b18ac1c and 18 decimal places. Decimal places concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry ERC20 and active. Its community-maintained description states: "Digital Dollars for the Internet Economy. Backed by institutional grade tokenized treasury funds and powered by Ethena Labs" Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. This dossier may explain those stated aims with that attribution. No deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The general ERC-20 specification is separate from this token implementation. Treat the generic application family as a documentary contract subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown.

Retrieved . Scope: documentation. Current network operation remains unverified.

Inspect the primary source ↗

Snapshot SHA-256: e9a1fc654fc81a4edf1b9ec815f11be6dfbed8b997abfaaba82f854afc418b78

Trust Wallet Assets: blockchains/ethereum/info/info.json (bbe582d25a22)

The pinned wallet blockchain-information file names the network Ethereum, symbol ETH, and lists its project website and explorer. That named network context accompanies token records in the repository's Ethereum subtree. This identifies the documented integration network without reproducing its operation. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.

Retrieved . Scope: documentation. Current network operation remains unverified.

Inspect the primary source ↗

Snapshot SHA-256: 5bf228bbcd577440dc00e5b783b680b0cfdf14504dc9d8b89340ba88d9e95502

Trust Wallet Assets: README.md (bbe582d25a22)

The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry of token information and logos across blockchains, used by the wallet and other projects. It says additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain. Anyone can submit assets, and inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. It also explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. The README states that its scripts and documentation use the MIT license. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.

Retrieved . Scope: documentation. Current network operation remains unverified.

Inspect the primary source ↗

Snapshot SHA-256: 51fc8f690972c850271ca0a6086516eae5ed411e94982fcae6534a4d08fccd73

Ethereum ERC-20: pinned token interface specification

The pinned ERC-20 specification describes a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It defines totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, third-party transfers after authorization, approval and remaining allowance. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use; a repeated approval overwrites that amount. The specification says callers must handle a false transfer result and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol and decimal-place metadata are optional in the standard. These interface requirements describe what a conforming implementation should do. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply or security. No token transaction was performed in this review. Copyright and related rights are waived under CC0.

Retrieved . Scope: documentation. Current network operation remains unverified.

Inspect the primary source ↗

Snapshot SHA-256: 50d0bdc535ed8987ac5c124cb5f9c39606806c97e909aae66ef4b747dd9c93dd

Only original summaries are distributed. Licensed raw market data stays private.

Continue the investigation