cryptosnif
Book of Ethereum (BOOE)
Documentary contract0x289ff00235d2b98b0145ff5d4435d3e92f9540a6
Unrated · 0% Evidence coverage
Operational strength remains unproven; unrated with 0% scoring coverage.
Documentary mechanisms alone cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes.
Inspect the evidenceThe source review explains documented mechanisms. Independent network checks remain pending.
The documented promise
This dossier examines the Book of Ethereum (BOOE) token on the Ethereum network. The stated purpose, attributed to a community-maintained registry entry, is to serve as a decentralized repository for cataloging memes within the Ethereum community. This aim positions the asset as a community-driven meme token launched fairly by its development team. The editorial scope is limited to explaining these documentary claims and their technical context without verifying operational reality.
Established facts
The primary source identifies the contract address 0x289ff00235d2b98b0145ff5d4435d3e92f9540a6 on the Ethereum blockchain, which uses the symbol ETH. The registry labels this entry as ERC20 active. ERC-20 is a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts, defining functions for reading balances, transferring tokens, and managing allowances. An allowance permits a named spender to use a specified amount of tokens on behalf of the owner. The specification also defines optional metadata such as name, symbol, and decimal places. The record notes 18 decimal places, which governs internal amount representation but does not indicate supply or value. The registry itself is a community-maintained collection where inclusion does not imply partnership with listed projects.
Unknowns
No independent verification of deployed bytecode, current controllers, beneficial ownership, or actual network usage has been performed. The specific implementation details of BOOE beyond the generic ERC-20 label remain unverified. Critical factors including supply distribution, concentration of holdings, liquidity depth, and complete incident history are unknown. The registry description contains promotional aims that have not been independently validated against on-chain data or official issuer statements.
Consequences
Relying solely on documentary mechanisms cannot establish actual network behavior or investment outcomes. Without verified control structures or usage data, the operational strength of the project remains unproven. The distinction between the general ERC-20 standard and the specific implementation of this token means that compliance with the interface does not guarantee security or functional correctness of the underlying logic.
Verdict
Book of Ethereum is unrated with zero percent scoring coverage. The available evidence consists only of registry metadata and standard definitions. No independent audit, live network observation, or criterion-specific verification has been admitted. The project status remains unclassified regarding economic niche and operational safety.
Evidence that would change it
A revised assessment would require reproduced identity checks, independent dated network observations, and criterion-specific evidence covering identity, supply, control, and security. Calibration and editorial review would follow the submission of these verified data points to move from an unrated status to a scored evaluation.
Each check earns its result.
| Check | Weight | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Exact asset identityEssential | 3% | Verification pending |
| Observable use | 15% | Verification pending |
| Economic role of the token | 10% | Verification pending |
| Supply mechanismsEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Ownership concentration | 8% | Verification pending |
| Value capture | 7% | Verification pending |
| Control powersEssential | 10% | Verification pending |
| Security verification | 7% | Verification pending |
| Decision process | 8% | Verification pending |
| Accountability | 7% | Verification pending |
| Incident history | 6% | Verification pending |
| Operational continuity | 4% | Verification pending |
| Execution conditions | 5% | Verification pending |
Family-specific checks: Observable usage, token necessity and dependencies.
Inspect the evidence
Sources behind this analysis
Trust Wallet: captured Ethereum record for Book of Ethereum
The pinned Trust Wallet Ethereum integration record names Book of Ethereum with symbol BOOE, contract 0x289ff00235d2b98b0145ff5d4435d3e92f9540a6 and 18 decimal places. Decimal places concern amount representation and do not measure supply or value. The record labels the entry ERC20 and active. Its community-maintained description states: "The Book of Ethereum project is designed as a community-driven meme token that aims to catalog all memes within the Ethereum community. It was launched fairly by the development team with the goal of creating a decentralized repository for meme shari..." Every project, economic, partnership, performance, supply, date and adoption statement within this quoted description is an attributed registry claim, not an independently established issuer statement or operational observation. This dossier may explain those stated aims with that attribution. No deployed implementation, rights, ownership, safety, supply, use or investment outcome was checked. The general ERC-20 specification is separate from this token implementation. Treat the generic application family as a documentary contract subject; its economic niche and scoring criteria remain unclassified and unknown.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: blockchains/ethereum/info/info.json (bbe582d25a22)
The pinned wallet blockchain-information file names the network Ethereum, symbol ETH, and lists its project website and explorer. That named network context accompanies token records in the repository's Ethereum subtree. This identifies the documented integration network without reproducing its operation. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Trust Wallet Assets: README.md (bbe582d25a22)
The Trust Wallet Assets README describes a community-maintained registry of token information and logos across blockchains, used by the wallet and other projects. It says additional token information is optional and unavailable on-chain. Anyone can submit assets, and inclusion does not imply a direct partnership with the listed projects. It also explicitly excludes brand-new tokens from submissions, so this source cannot provide an exhaustive inventory of recent launches. The README states that its scripts and documentation use the MIT license. This source is the wallet project's own integration registry, maintained with community submissions. Its project descriptions are documentary claims from that registry, not independently verified issuer statements or operational observations. The active status is a metadata label, with no live-network validation. No deployment bytecode, controller, supply, reserve, use, concentration, liquidity, security audit, incident completeness or investment return has been established.
Inspect the primary source ↗Ethereum ERC-20: pinned token interface specification
The pinned ERC-20 specification describes a standard interface for fungible tokens in smart contracts. It defines totalSupply and balanceOf reads, transfers, third-party transfers after authorization, approval and remaining allowance. An allowance is the amount a named spender may use; a repeated approval overwrites that amount. The specification says callers must handle a false transfer result and describes Transfer and Approval events. Name, symbol and decimal-place metadata are optional in the standard. These interface requirements describe what a conforming implementation should do. A wallet ERC20 label establishes no independently checked compliance, actual deployed implementation, controller permissions, token use, supply or security. No token transaction was performed in this review. Copyright and related rights are waived under CC0.
Inspect the primary source ↗Only original summaries are distributed. Licensed raw market data stays private.